Anomics
A project about why modern life feels hard to finish — even when everyone is trying, the rules are clear, and the system is “working.”
Start here: How to Read Anomics
Not self-help. Not politics. A structural diagnosis of non-settlement: when systems keep running but stop concluding.
What’s the problem?
Decisions don’t bind — things get “decided” but keep reopening.
Processes don’t end — review becomes the outcome.
Time doesn’t close accounts — the past stays active forever.
What Anomics means
Anomics studies settlement: the ordinary function that lets disputes close, roles end, and obligations discharge. Many modern systems preserve activity, procedure, and memory — while losing the ability to conclude.
Choose a reader path
General (10–20 minutes)
Read the pieces that explain the project fast, without jargon.
Core Framework (60–120 minutes)
Read the seven core essays in the intended order.
Academic / Method
“Macro/Micro typology + negative design method.
Anomics as Negative Design Science
The Core Essays
recommended order
Core Essays
- How to Read Anomics
- Anomics — A Summary
- Orientation
- Anomie: Why It Keeps Failing
- Uneven Anomie
- Recognition Without Verdict
- Anomics as Negative Design Science
Mechanism Essays
- Authority After Authorization
- Procedure Without Verdict
- Memory Without Forgetting
- When Instruments Become Environments
- Dynamic Hedging Beyond Markets
- Excellence Without Escape
- Life in Anomie
The Books
diagnostic applications
These books apply the same framework to specific domains.
What this is not
- Not self-help or “life hacks”
- Not a political program
- Not nostalgia for older institutions
- Not blaming individuals
- Not moral panic about modernity
- Not “everything is broken” doom